v11962_m;v11963_m; v11964_m; v11965_m; v11966_m; v11967_m; v11968_m; v11969_m; v11970_m; v11971_m; v11972_m; v11973_m; v11974_m; v11975_m; v11976_m; v11977_m; v11978_m; v11979_m; v11980_m; v11981_m; v11982_m; v11983_m; v11984_m; v11985_m; v11986_m; v11987_m; v11988_m; v11989_m; v11990_m; v11991_m; v11992_m; v11993_m; v11994_m; v11995_m; v11996_m; v11997_m; v11998_m; v11999_m; v12000_m; v12001_m; v12002_m; v12003_m; v12004_m; v12005_m; v12006_m; v12007_m; v12008_m; v12009_m; v12010_m; v12011_m; v12012_m; v12013_m; v12014_m;

Background provided by the submitter · verbatim

There is several validation rules which obliged us to declare Financial Garantee and Collateral less than the Gross Carrying Amount in FIN 19.00. There is multiple business cases where we can have Financial garantee and collateral more than gross carrying amount. And no regulatory text which support this validation rules.

Rationale for rejection · verbatim

This question has been rejected because the issue it deals with is already explained or addressed in paragraph 268, Part 2 of Annex V of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451 where it is stated that:'[...]

Amounts reported for collateral received and guarantees received shall be calculated in accordance with paragraphs 172 and 174 of this Part. The sum of the amounts reported for both collateral and guarantees shall be capped at the carrying amount of the related on-balance sheet exposure or nominal amount after deduction of provisions of the related off-balance sheet exposure'

.

For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see '

Additional background and guidance for asking questions

'.